There are a lot of research papers that can be called “research work”, but not all research papers can be considered “good.” Same as the statement, many can write but not all are good writers that can write good articles. So, how do we know if a piece of research work is good or bad? When we buy a book or a magazine or anything that is read, we usually read first the title and then the summary that can be found usually at the front or back of the manuscript. A good title really catches our attention especially when it is related to our interest; likewise the summary. There are also cases that the manuscript’s title is eye catchy but when you read its content or summary, in a few paragraphs or even in a few sentences you start to dislike it and then you decide not to read the entire paper. There are also cases like after reading the manuscript, you don’t like to read it again, not anymore because you didn’t like the story, it was dreadful, it was boring, it was not good.
One of the criteria of a good research work is the title and how it is stated. A title that can catch people’s attention is really good since they will have the interest to read the entire paper. This kind of title can be considered as the research paper’s great asset.
A research paper is divided into sections. It was mentioned in one of the articles that I have read that important sections should be included while the other sections can be included as necessary. What are these important sections? These important sections are the usual sections that can be seen in a research paper (e.g. title, introduction, significance of the study, objectives, review of related literature, analytical framework/methodology, expected outputs, work plan, budget, results, discussion, conclusion and so on.) The sections should be organized based on the standard format to present information clearly and concisely. It is important to understand the difference among the sections and it is very important also to put information in the appropriate location. The information should be clean and well organized so that readers can understand what they are reading and what it is all about.
A research can also be considered as good if it is in the paper the researcher’s motivation for doing the research, the design and execution, and the meaning of the results, and if it is written in a style that is exceedingly clear. Paragraphs are coherent and well ordered; there is a logical paragraph transition, and a fully functional title, introduction and conclusion. All the questions raised in the paper are answered most importantly the problem. The originality of the work is also very important. However, if it is a replication of the previous study, it should be in a different setting or with a different population.
The research paper is well presented which refers to the way it is documented, written, or printed; the author uses American English words that are understandable. Figures are correctly gathered and calculated. It is also good if the author uses illustrations in the paper for clarity and since it is easier to comprehend. Presentation of the charts and data sheets in the paper is also good but it must be accompanied with each corresponding interpretations. Say for example, the author of the research paper conducted a survey and made a comparison among the data he gathered or between the previous data and the recent data. It needs mathematical equations and calculations. The readers were not there when the survey was conducted and so in order for the readers to really understand what the illustration is for, how the author come up with the illustration and what it is all about, its interpretation must be at the top of it or below of it. It is good to have reusability of the research work in which others can explore the unexpected and contradictory findings of the research and challenge them to continue the study and improve it more.
Based on the detailed research proposal format, a good research work addresses the current need of a particular group, people, country, or the environment and intends to solve the problem. The objective is adequate enough to address the stated problem, it is clear and as to what the proposal is to achieve and is attainable within the time frame and indicated resources. The review of literature is complete enough to cover related researches and activities conducted for the last ten years. The research is guided by analytical framework and that all variables to be measured and evaluated are included in the methodology. Related technology which is protected by any of the intellectual rights scheme like patent, trademark, copyright, etc is indicated. The activities are consistent with the objectives and expected outputs and leads to the attainment of the expected outputs. The budget is reasonable and appropriate, consistent with the proposed work plan, indicates counterpart funds if available.
When writing a research paper, the researcher should also consider the following: the audience, style and tone, should avoid plagiarism, and the organization of the ideas and information. It is the purpose of the researcher to inform the audience about the research and particular issues. Therefore, the researcher is recommended to know about the audience and their positions and can be included in the considerations in writing the paper.
There should have enough resources for the researcher to gather more information. In that way, he can have enough evidences and logical reasons that can support his research, its claims and can contribute substantively. It is also recommended that sources should be recent enough to be persuasive. And it should be based on at least some recent article-length sources. The Communications of the ACM (CACM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), latest IT news from www.idg.net, the science and/or technology sections in major newspapers from www.nytimes.com are just some of the possible sources. And in the paper, correct citations must be allowed. The documentation style should be accurately and consistently used and is appropriate to the discipline. The researcher can refer/consult to the following: MLA, APA, CBE, or U-Chicago.
Hypotheses of the problem and/or research questions should be stated clearly and completely. It is also a must to define the terms. The researcher should provide operational definition for the important terms. When acronyms are used in some sections of the paper, it is also important to define those acronyms so that readers will not get confused. Based from my experience, when I was reading a scientific paper, the author of the said paper failed to define the unfamiliar terms and the acronyms that were used in the paper. It is also one of the reasons that readers will not understand what the paper and the author is trying to imply and what the subject is all about.
The research design which is the overall plan for conducting the research should also be considered; what type of research design that was used. There are types of research design (e.g. experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental) but the researcher can only use the design that is appropriate for the problem. The collection of data is done by the procedures developed in design. According to the “Tomorrow’s Professor SM Mailing List” in its article “Writing a paper that will get published,” the two elements that most often leading to rejection is poorly planned study design and lack of detail in methods. Analytical methods that are controlled by theoretical assumption are no longer acceptable.
Researchers should remember to pay attention to issues of plagiarism. To avoid errors in this regard, the department of biology at George Mason University recommends reading a section from a source and then restating in writing what you remember of the main points and then citing the source of the information in the text.
Based on the previous assignment that was to look for three published scientific papers, what I noticed is that most of the papers composed only four to five pages or more than that but not over ten. The authors of the paper were really trying to make it short but not to the point that it could hardly be understood. They were trying to present the information concisely and clearly. For me, the way the authors presented the information in the paper was good. It was concise and clear enough to understand. It was written direct to the point. When this kind of style is used, readers will not get bored in reading the paper.
The title, objective of the study, significance, methodology and the conclusion I think are the highlights of a research paper. Firstly, it is because the title is read first. It can be an advantage to a research paper when the title captivates the people to read the entire paper. Secondly, the objective of the study reflects the overall content of the paper, the interest of the researcher and also the expected output. Thirdly, the significance of the study describes how important the study is, the benefits that it can provide and the people that shall be benefited. Fourthly, the methodology describes how the study is done including the research design used by the researcher and the procedures. It is important because it determines the reliability of the given information and the output. Lastly, the conclusion is also very important because it answers the problem of the study and also the objective of the study. It describes the achievement of the study whether the study succeeded and whether the expected output has been achieved.
One of the criteria of a good research work is the title and how it is stated. A title that can catch people’s attention is really good since they will have the interest to read the entire paper. This kind of title can be considered as the research paper’s great asset.
A research paper is divided into sections. It was mentioned in one of the articles that I have read that important sections should be included while the other sections can be included as necessary. What are these important sections? These important sections are the usual sections that can be seen in a research paper (e.g. title, introduction, significance of the study, objectives, review of related literature, analytical framework/methodology, expected outputs, work plan, budget, results, discussion, conclusion and so on.) The sections should be organized based on the standard format to present information clearly and concisely. It is important to understand the difference among the sections and it is very important also to put information in the appropriate location. The information should be clean and well organized so that readers can understand what they are reading and what it is all about.
A research can also be considered as good if it is in the paper the researcher’s motivation for doing the research, the design and execution, and the meaning of the results, and if it is written in a style that is exceedingly clear. Paragraphs are coherent and well ordered; there is a logical paragraph transition, and a fully functional title, introduction and conclusion. All the questions raised in the paper are answered most importantly the problem. The originality of the work is also very important. However, if it is a replication of the previous study, it should be in a different setting or with a different population.
The research paper is well presented which refers to the way it is documented, written, or printed; the author uses American English words that are understandable. Figures are correctly gathered and calculated. It is also good if the author uses illustrations in the paper for clarity and since it is easier to comprehend. Presentation of the charts and data sheets in the paper is also good but it must be accompanied with each corresponding interpretations. Say for example, the author of the research paper conducted a survey and made a comparison among the data he gathered or between the previous data and the recent data. It needs mathematical equations and calculations. The readers were not there when the survey was conducted and so in order for the readers to really understand what the illustration is for, how the author come up with the illustration and what it is all about, its interpretation must be at the top of it or below of it. It is good to have reusability of the research work in which others can explore the unexpected and contradictory findings of the research and challenge them to continue the study and improve it more.
Based on the detailed research proposal format, a good research work addresses the current need of a particular group, people, country, or the environment and intends to solve the problem. The objective is adequate enough to address the stated problem, it is clear and as to what the proposal is to achieve and is attainable within the time frame and indicated resources. The review of literature is complete enough to cover related researches and activities conducted for the last ten years. The research is guided by analytical framework and that all variables to be measured and evaluated are included in the methodology. Related technology which is protected by any of the intellectual rights scheme like patent, trademark, copyright, etc is indicated. The activities are consistent with the objectives and expected outputs and leads to the attainment of the expected outputs. The budget is reasonable and appropriate, consistent with the proposed work plan, indicates counterpart funds if available.
When writing a research paper, the researcher should also consider the following: the audience, style and tone, should avoid plagiarism, and the organization of the ideas and information. It is the purpose of the researcher to inform the audience about the research and particular issues. Therefore, the researcher is recommended to know about the audience and their positions and can be included in the considerations in writing the paper.
There should have enough resources for the researcher to gather more information. In that way, he can have enough evidences and logical reasons that can support his research, its claims and can contribute substantively. It is also recommended that sources should be recent enough to be persuasive. And it should be based on at least some recent article-length sources. The Communications of the ACM (CACM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), latest IT news from www.idg.net, the science and/or technology sections in major newspapers from www.nytimes.com are just some of the possible sources. And in the paper, correct citations must be allowed. The documentation style should be accurately and consistently used and is appropriate to the discipline. The researcher can refer/consult to the following: MLA, APA, CBE, or U-Chicago.
Hypotheses of the problem and/or research questions should be stated clearly and completely. It is also a must to define the terms. The researcher should provide operational definition for the important terms. When acronyms are used in some sections of the paper, it is also important to define those acronyms so that readers will not get confused. Based from my experience, when I was reading a scientific paper, the author of the said paper failed to define the unfamiliar terms and the acronyms that were used in the paper. It is also one of the reasons that readers will not understand what the paper and the author is trying to imply and what the subject is all about.
The research design which is the overall plan for conducting the research should also be considered; what type of research design that was used. There are types of research design (e.g. experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental) but the researcher can only use the design that is appropriate for the problem. The collection of data is done by the procedures developed in design. According to the “Tomorrow’s Professor SM Mailing List” in its article “Writing a paper that will get published,” the two elements that most often leading to rejection is poorly planned study design and lack of detail in methods. Analytical methods that are controlled by theoretical assumption are no longer acceptable.
Researchers should remember to pay attention to issues of plagiarism. To avoid errors in this regard, the department of biology at George Mason University recommends reading a section from a source and then restating in writing what you remember of the main points and then citing the source of the information in the text.
Based on the previous assignment that was to look for three published scientific papers, what I noticed is that most of the papers composed only four to five pages or more than that but not over ten. The authors of the paper were really trying to make it short but not to the point that it could hardly be understood. They were trying to present the information concisely and clearly. For me, the way the authors presented the information in the paper was good. It was concise and clear enough to understand. It was written direct to the point. When this kind of style is used, readers will not get bored in reading the paper.
The title, objective of the study, significance, methodology and the conclusion I think are the highlights of a research paper. Firstly, it is because the title is read first. It can be an advantage to a research paper when the title captivates the people to read the entire paper. Secondly, the objective of the study reflects the overall content of the paper, the interest of the researcher and also the expected output. Thirdly, the significance of the study describes how important the study is, the benefits that it can provide and the people that shall be benefited. Fourthly, the methodology describes how the study is done including the research design used by the researcher and the procedures. It is important because it determines the reliability of the given information and the output. Lastly, the conclusion is also very important because it answers the problem of the study and also the objective of the study. It describes the achievement of the study whether the study succeeded and whether the expected output has been achieved.
References:
- “The Problem: The Heart of the Research Process”, Week 2 Lecture 2, ISYS3015 Analytical Methods for IS Professionals, School of IT, The University of Sydney, Thursday, Mar. 19, 2004.
http://www.ug.it.usyd.edu.au/~isys3015/s1_2004/lecture_notes/Problem.ppt - “Research Paper Evaluation Criteria”
http://faculty.goucher.edu/eng105sanders/research_paper_evaluation_criter.htm - “Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#316 WRITING A PAPER THAT WILL GET PUBLISHED”. Tomorrow’s ProfessorSM Mailing List, 15[7]:30, Apr. 2, 2001
http://ctl.stanford.edu/Tomprof/postings/316.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment